the only way i could have loved this more is if it were written by david markson — i suspect i like it even more than i would precisely because i couldn’t actually stop thinking of it as (or reading it as) a david markson novel rather than what it was. also thinking this is just the kind of thing i would file happily away as an inverted way of teaching ‘pierre menard’ only the little buggers are so ill-read these days you can’t count on any of them having read markson. oh i’m wasted on not teaching undergrads.(also, one thinks, ought be read together with manganelli’s ‘ouroboric’ novels.)
