Best of the Transparent Hummingbird
marry under WC, has no capacity to marry any other woman under any other marriage law (which provision provides for this?!) - 4(2)
bit if you’re already married under another married law cannot marry again under women’s charter –
Australian approach was much better: requiring terror or abuse for duress seems to be a
not unreasonable but it does not family dynamics in certain kinds of asian cultures.
if domicile is changed then the prohiition from your old domicile would not apply even if a singaproe court was maing the determination fi the marriage is valid but both hti swif’es domicile and hsi own new domicile msut allow polygamy
unde
- i.e. say you’re bipolar and you got married during your manic phase — that already negates the validty of consent this would fall under 105 c - lack of valid consent
(the language of the provision stigmatising in
protective nature of
if section 105 causes (void marriages) can be raise dby any party with an interest. 105 causes however (voidable marraige) has to be was satisfied that it was “her desire to remain in this country and to continue in the muslim faith.
but if you don’t comply with
at the age of 18 you have full capacity to contract marriage but if you’re under 21, the women’s charter requires your parents to consent. the registrar would not issue you with a marriage licence otherwise. and
and yet the effect of non-compliance does not affect the validity of the marriage and yet the effect
it is still a completely valid marriage but
disability to contract marriages because already married person
formalities are decided by lex celebratonis loci and so
section 12 male and female
change will be a long time coming we were ahead of the UK by changing this legislati and in this regard we are ahead of
good but,
moh ah kiu predecessor
it is increasingly hard to find a country today with polygamous marraige but if you were to attempt to contract a marriage under a polygamous marriage law in that country, you would be under a disability unless you were able to establish a change of domicile to another country (not necessary the same one you’re attempting to marry in - just another one which does not have capacity prescriptions relating to monogamy) and, because of the dual domicile rule, you would need your prospective wife’s antenuptial domicile to also
solemnisation and capacity prescriptions. solemnisation have to do with the formalities — did you have a valid marriage licence? was the person licenced to perform marriages, procedural defects can be cured, some are critical ( generallyt he rule is that it has to comply withthe solmenisation rules of th jurisdiction you regardless of where you are domiciled to fulfil this set of prescirptions, it has to be in compliance with the other set has to do with capacity where go to your do you have mental capacity are you underage are you already married are you biologica
you would each have to have capacity to enter a both of your antenuptial domicile 3(5) preservers
foramlities do not matter as long as they
comply with the formalities of the forum provided (becos of the dual domicile rule) your prospective wife’s domicile as long as you have been (and are currently still) married under the women’s charter as long as you remain domiciled in singapore change of domicile would be 3(5) preserves — rebuttable presuption taht a singaproe citizen is a singapore domiciliary in litigation to
in the event that the registrar does issue a licence, however, notwithstanding that licence was obtained by fraud (you lied in your declaration, you asked another adult to pretend to be your parent,
lack of parental consent is not significant and will not
even though it is a statutory prescription, adminstrative filter your marriage is still valid
void and voidable marraiges
lack of consent (whether it is duress, mental incapacity, or other reasons) only renders your marriage voidable, not ab initio.
non-consummation, it is understood that this is a marriage that had been validly formed and is voidable because of certain subsequence that fundamentally changes the character of the relationship validly formed, but frustrated — dissolved v– not a divorce - annulment — exists up to the time it was dissolved but - it was not solemnised by a someone licenced to perform the marriage, or lack of capacity — you were underage or already married, for eg, then your void marriage ab initio - the marriage never legally existed, you do not even need a court declaration to this effet, it is automatic administrative
breach of capacity
divorce
two kinds of nullity judgments void (never existed legally — for eg, you had not yet dissolved a previous at the time of marriage)
CPF act does not trump the WC
the 106 remedy of voidable marriage is available only to parties to the marriage but 105 void marriage
105 void marraige allows 3Ps to apply to
we assume you need locus standi but you may not have to be able to show legal interest lwk is suggesting you can simply go to court as a “concerned citizen” to get a declaration of nullity of someone else’s married if you knew they were
Dear Sven,
Thank you so much for your birthday wishes!
sorry
Statutory prescriptions are 7 days 14-18, we are, generally, always at work in france you have a minimum of 5 weeks of vacation leave by statutory prescription; here, the statutory minimum is 7 days, and 14 days is the norm. 18 days is exceptionally generous.
not finding a case for the proposition that a singaporean man married under the women’s charter who then converts to islam cannot exercise his religious right to marry his second to fourth wife until he terminates his exisiting women’s charter marriage. but if he does divorce his first wife he can then contract polygamous marriage
sottomayor exception in t
coupled with section 9 child law